What needs to be clarified
Review whether conclusions match test coverage, separating drainage, waterproofing and enclosure water paths.
Materials to prepare
- Report, protocol, photographs and trial sequence
- Drain, waterproofing and junction details
- Dated moisture videos identifying shower use
What to compare
Identify water application and the joints actually tested. Check observation duration, initial moisture and monitoring points behind the partition. Compare the proposed water path with details. Plan separate specialist trials for untested zones, preventing further damage and documenting coverage and visibility.
Possible outcome of the analysis
A coverage table and review may assess whether excluded explanations were adequately tested; untested zones receive a targeted examination programme without predetermining the source.
Limits of the conclusions
A dry result from direct drain discharge covers only that path. It cannot confirm concealed waterproofing or exclude enclosure leakage.